Crow vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Crow
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Crow
Chickasaw
2,555
SOCIAL INDEX
23.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
251st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Crow Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,663,562 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.679. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 4.500% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 4,500.0 Chickasaw.
Crow vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 42.5%), per capita income ($31,729 compared to $36,475, a difference of 15.0%), and median male earnings ($42,434 compared to $47,832, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $34,414, a difference of 2.5%), householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $44,763, a difference of 5.0%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $40,672, a difference of 5.1%).
Income Metric | Crow | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $31,729 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $76,605 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,681 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,707 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,434 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,266 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,012 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $71,337 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $74,257 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $49,234 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 27.2% |
Crow vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 65.1%), single father poverty (30.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 59.8%), and family poverty (16.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 48.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.5%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 12.2%), and single female poverty (32.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 23.4%).
Poverty Metric | Crow | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 19.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 22.1% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 33.2% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 31.0% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 26.0% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 26.4% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 23.3% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 32.4% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 30.3% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 15.2% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 13.1% |
Crow vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 282.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 269.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (13.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 223.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 7.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 14.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 22.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Crow | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 11.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 10.6% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 12.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 20.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 26.2% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 15.4% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 10.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 17.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 16.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 8.2% | Good 5.4% |
Crow vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.92%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 2.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Crow | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 60.8% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 73.3% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.5% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.9% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 78.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 75.9% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 76.5% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.3% | Tragic 79.0% |
Crow vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 27.7%), average family size (3.82 compared to 3.19, a difference of 20.0%), and currently married (40.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.88%), family households (65.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Crow | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.3% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.4% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.4% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.82 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 40.4% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 40.4% | Tragic 36.3% |
Crow vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 40.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Crow | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 11.0% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Fair 89.3% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Good 55.7% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.5% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Crow vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 9.6%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.010%), ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.36%).
Education Level Metric | Crow | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 99.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 99.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 99.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 99.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 99.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 99.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 99.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 99.4% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 99.1% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 99.0% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.0% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.2% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.5% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.6% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 27.7% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.6% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Crow vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 40.5%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 27.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 3.2%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.5%).
Disability Metric | Crow | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.9% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.6% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Fair 17.3% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Poor 2.5% | Tragic 2.9% |