Romanian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Romanian
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Romanians
Chickasaw
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Romanian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,015,266 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.783. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.045% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to an increase of 45.1 Chickasaw.
Romanian vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,445 compared to $36,475, a difference of 32.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,609 compared to $82,193, a difference of 32.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,544 compared to $77,929, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 2.9%), householder income over 65 years ($64,142 compared to $53,732, a difference of 19.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,632 compared to $44,763, a difference of 19.8%).
Income Metric | Romanian | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $48,445 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $111,243 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $91,994 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,244 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $60,063 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,663 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,632 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $102,544 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $108,609 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,142 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.0% | Tragic 27.2% |
Romanian vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 36.5%), single female poverty (19.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 33.9%), and family poverty (8.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.56%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.1%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 14.6%).
Poverty Metric | Romanian | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.0% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.6% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.8% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 13.1% |
Romanian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 25.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.90%).
Unemployment Metric | Romanian | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Excellent 5.1% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.7% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 9.0% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Good 5.4% |
Romanian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Romanian | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Fair 65.0% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.8% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.5% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.5% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Good 84.5% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Tragic 79.0% |
Romanian vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 29.7%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 26.3%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.22%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.23%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Romanian | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Good 64.5% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.4% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Tragic 36.3% |
Romanian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 39.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 15.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Romanian | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Average 55.5% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Romanian vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 57.2%), master's degree (17.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 50.4%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.010%), 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and 4th grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.090%).
Education Level Metric | Romanian | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.8% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.8% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.7% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.5% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.2% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.4% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.7% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.6% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.2% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Romanian vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 54.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 51.9%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 10.8%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 11.6%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.5%).
Disability Metric | Romanian | Chickasaw |
Disability | Good 11.6% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.6% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.1% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Good 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |