Sierra Leonean vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Sierra Leonean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Sierra Leoneans

Chickasaw

Average
Fair
4,851
SOCIAL INDEX
46.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
191st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chickasaw Integration in Sierra Leonean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,237,255 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Sierra Leonean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.072. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sierra Leoneans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sierra Leoneans corresponds to a decrease of 5.6 Chickasaw.
Sierra Leonean Integration in Chickasaw Communities

Sierra Leonean vs Chickasaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($57,272 compared to $44,763, a difference of 28.0%), wage/income gap (21.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 26.7%), and median household income ($88,463 compared to $70,005, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($54,279 compared to $47,832, a difference of 13.5%), median earnings ($48,286 compared to $40,672, a difference of 18.7%), and per capita income ($43,405 compared to $36,475, a difference of 19.0%).
Sierra Leonean vs Chickasaw Income
Income MetricSierra LeoneanChickasaw
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,405
Tragic
$36,475
Median Family Income
Good
$103,859
Tragic
$85,356
Median Household Income
Excellent
$88,463
Tragic
$70,005
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,286
Tragic
$40,672
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,279
Tragic
$47,832
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,868
Tragic
$34,414
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,272
Tragic
$44,763
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$93,435
Tragic
$77,929
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,427
Tragic
$82,193
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,038
Tragic
$53,732
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
27.2%

Sierra Leonean vs Chickasaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (19.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 33.0%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 29.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 7.1%).
Sierra Leonean vs Chickasaw Poverty
Poverty MetricSierra LeoneanChickasaw
Poverty
Fair
12.6%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Poor
9.5%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Fair
11.4%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Fair
13.7%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.2%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.7%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Tragic
16.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.7%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.2%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Tragic
34.4%
Married Couples
Good
5.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.5%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Fair
12.2%
Tragic
13.1%

Sierra Leonean vs Chickasaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 24.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 6.9%).
Sierra Leonean vs Chickasaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSierra LeoneanChickasaw
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.5%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.2%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.5%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.7%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.4%

Sierra Leonean vs Chickasaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (68.9% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.5% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.6% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.7%).
Sierra Leonean vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSierra LeoneanChickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
68.9%
Tragic
62.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.5%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.6%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.3%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.8%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.0%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.5%
Tragic
79.0%

Sierra Leonean vs Chickasaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 17.2%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.0%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.86%), family households with children (28.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.30 compared to 3.19, a difference of 3.4%).
Sierra Leonean vs Chickasaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSierra LeoneanChickasaw
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.9%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.9%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.30
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.4%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.9%
Tragic
36.3%

Sierra Leonean vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 40.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 26.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.9% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 21.2%).
Sierra Leonean vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSierra LeoneanChickasaw
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.0%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.0%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.9%
Exceptional
59.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
7.4%

Sierra Leonean vs Chickasaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 46.9%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 36.5%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.28%), 10th grade (93.7% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.38%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.68%).
Sierra Leonean vs Chickasaw Education Level
Education Level MetricSierra LeoneanChickasaw
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Fair
96.0%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Average
94.8%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Average
93.7%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Average
92.6%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.0%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Good
66.0%
Tragic
60.4%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.2%
Tragic
53.3%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
47.7%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.1%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Good
4.5%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
2.0%
Tragic
1.5%

Sierra Leonean vs Chickasaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 79.0%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 50.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 7.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.4%).
Sierra Leonean vs Chickasaw Disability
Disability MetricSierra LeoneanChickasaw
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
15.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
15.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.2%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Excellent
10.8%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.2%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Tragic
51.2%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.9%