Palestinian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,755,939 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Palestinian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Palestinians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.068% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Palestinians corresponds to an increase of 68.2 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Palestinian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,721 compared to $82,193, a difference of 31.1%), median household income ($90,574 compared to $70,005, a difference of 29.4%), and median family income ($109,413 compared to $85,356, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 4.0%), householder income under 25 years ($51,515 compared to $44,763, a difference of 15.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,800 compared to $53,732, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Palestinian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 37.9%), single female poverty (19.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 36.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Palestinian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 27.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.26%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.58%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Palestinian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Palestinian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 27.8%), births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 27.7%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.51%), family households (65.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Palestinian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 15.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 10.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.60%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.7% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Palestinian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 42.7%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 42.4%), and bachelor's degree (40.7% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.11%), 8th grade (96.2% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.26%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Palestinian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 56.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 55.5%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 10.1%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 10.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 23.5%).