Carpatho Rusyn vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,614,866 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.406. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Carpatho Rusyns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.403% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Carpatho Rusyns corresponds to an increase of 403.5 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,248 compared to $36,475, a difference of 29.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,449 compared to $77,929, a difference of 27.6%), and median family income ($107,502 compared to $85,356, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.38%), householder income under 25 years ($49,113 compared to $44,763, a difference of 9.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,093 compared to $53,732, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 47.0%), family poverty (7.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 43.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.3%), single father poverty (18.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 31.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 16.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (87.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 31.2%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 24.4%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.7% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.44%), currently married (47.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.97%), and average family size (3.06 compared to 3.19, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 35.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 34.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 23.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 56.8%), master's degree (17.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 53.3%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.31%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 53.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 40.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 8.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 14.3%).