Immigrants from Cambodia vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Cambodia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Cambodia

Chickasaw

Fair
Fair
2,971
SOCIAL INDEX
27.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
236th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Cambodia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,181,088 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Cambodia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.375. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cambodia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.558% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cambodia corresponds to an increase of 558.3 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Cambodia Integration in Chickasaw Communities

Immigrants from Cambodia vs Chickasaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($83,304 compared to $70,005, a difference of 19.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,533 compared to $77,929, a difference of 17.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,537 compared to $82,193, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($57,580 compared to $53,732, a difference of 7.2%), median male earnings ($51,594 compared to $47,832, a difference of 7.9%), and per capita income ($40,434 compared to $36,475, a difference of 10.8%).
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Chickasaw Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CambodiaChickasaw
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$40,434
Tragic
$36,475
Median Family Income
Tragic
$97,222
Tragic
$85,356
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,304
Tragic
$70,005
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,090
Tragic
$40,672
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,594
Tragic
$47,832
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,833
Tragic
$34,414
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,450
Tragic
$44,763
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,533
Tragic
$77,929
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$96,537
Tragic
$82,193
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$57,580
Tragic
$53,732
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.3%
Tragic
27.2%

Immigrants from Cambodia vs Chickasaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 30.3%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 28.3%), and single father poverty (14.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.8%), receiving food stamps (13.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.1% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 8.3%).
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Chickasaw Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CambodiaChickasaw
Poverty
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Tragic
9.9%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.8%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.9%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
18.1%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Tragic
16.3%
Single Females
Fair
21.2%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Tragic
34.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.4%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
13.1%

Immigrants from Cambodia vs Chickasaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 20.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 17.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.6%).
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Chickasaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CambodiaChickasaw
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.5%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.6%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Average
4.8%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from Cambodia vs Chickasaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.5%).
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CambodiaChickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Tragic
62.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Average
36.7%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.4%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.7%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
79.0%

Immigrants from Cambodia vs Chickasaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 19.9%), currently married (44.5% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 4.7%), and average family size (3.33 compared to 3.19, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.6%), married-couple households (44.9% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.3%).
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Chickasaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CambodiaChickasaw
Family Households
Exceptional
65.4%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.9%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.9%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.33
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.5%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.8%
Tragic
36.3%

Immigrants from Cambodia vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 29.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.70%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 4.9%).
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CambodiaChickasaw
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
89.8%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.2%
Exceptional
59.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.1%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
7.4%

Immigrants from Cambodia vs Chickasaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 106.3%), master's degree (12.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.9%), and bachelor's degree (34.2% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 1.3%), college, under 1 year (61.5% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and nursery school (96.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.9%).
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Chickasaw Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CambodiaChickasaw
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
95.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.7%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.3%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.9%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.6%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.1%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.6%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.2%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.5%
Tragic
60.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.4%
Tragic
53.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.3%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.2%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Cambodia vs Chickasaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 51.6%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 47.9%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (50.0% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 7.6%).
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Chickasaw Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CambodiaChickasaw
Disability
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
15.2%
Males
Poor
11.5%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
15.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Average
6.6%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.3%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.0%
Tragic
51.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Good
3.0%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.9%