Immigrants from Croatia vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Croatia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Croatia

Chickasaw

Excellent
Fair
8,526
SOCIAL INDEX
82.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
67th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Croatia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,371,393 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Croatia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Croatia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.500% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Croatia corresponds to an increase of 500.4 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Croatia Integration in Chickasaw Communities

Immigrants from Croatia vs Chickasaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,417 compared to $36,475, a difference of 38.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,503 compared to $77,929, a difference of 34.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,304 compared to $82,193, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.5%), householder income over 65 years ($63,168 compared to $53,732, a difference of 17.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,343 compared to $44,763, a difference of 21.4%).
Immigrants from Croatia vs Chickasaw Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CroatiaChickasaw
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$50,417
Tragic
$36,475
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$112,323
Tragic
$85,356
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$92,225
Tragic
$70,005
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,581
Tragic
$40,672
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$60,914
Tragic
$47,832
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,258
Tragic
$34,414
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,343
Tragic
$44,763
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,503
Tragic
$77,929
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,304
Tragic
$82,193
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,168
Tragic
$53,732
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.2%
Tragic
27.2%

Immigrants from Croatia vs Chickasaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 42.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 39.6%), and single female poverty (18.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and single father poverty (16.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 14.3%).
Immigrants from Croatia vs Chickasaw Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CroatiaChickasaw
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Exceptional
12.0%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.9%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.0%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
16.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.9%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.6%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
34.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
13.1%

Immigrants from Croatia vs Chickasaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 26.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.23%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.32%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.42%).
Immigrants from Croatia vs Chickasaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CroatiaChickasaw
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Good
5.2%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.3%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.5%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Average
4.8%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Average
8.9%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from Croatia vs Chickasaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.4%).
Immigrants from Croatia vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CroatiaChickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Tragic
62.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.1%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.1%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.1%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
79.0%

Immigrants from Croatia vs Chickasaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 40.6%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 29.4%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.6%), married-couple households (46.7% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and currently married (47.5% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Croatia vs Chickasaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CroatiaChickasaw
Family Households
Tragic
63.1%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.5%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.8%
Tragic
36.3%

Immigrants from Croatia vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 65.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 39.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 13.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 29.2%).
Immigrants from Croatia vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CroatiaChickasaw
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
87.0%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.8%
Exceptional
59.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.2%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
7.4%

Immigrants from Croatia vs Chickasaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 56.8%), master's degree (17.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 51.3%), and bachelor's degree (42.3% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.030%), 4th grade (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and 8th grade (96.2% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.21%).
Immigrants from Croatia vs Chickasaw Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CroatiaChickasaw
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.4%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.3%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.8%
Tragic
60.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.3%
Tragic
53.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.2%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.3%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.3%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Croatia vs Chickasaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 58.5%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 54.5%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 12.5%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 12.9%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 18.5%).
Immigrants from Croatia vs Chickasaw Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CroatiaChickasaw
Disability
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
15.2%
Males
Good
11.0%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
15.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.3%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.5%
Tragic
51.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Fair
3.1%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Good
6.0%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
2.9%