Apache vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,851,843 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Apache communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.226. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Apache within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.023% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Apache corresponds to a decrease of 22.6 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Apache and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 10.6%), householder income under 25 years ($49,395 compared to $44,763, a difference of 10.3%), and per capita income ($34,886 compared to $36,475, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,184 compared to $82,193, a difference of 0.010%), median earnings ($40,388 compared to $40,672, a difference of 0.70%), and median family income ($84,451 compared to $85,356, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Apache and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 54.6%), receiving food stamps (18.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 39.6%), and family poverty (14.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (27.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 5.5%), single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 6.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.3% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Apache and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 70.8%), male unemployment (8.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 66.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (7.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 65.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Apache and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (77.9% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.7% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (79.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Apache and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.9%), births to unmarried women (39.9% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 9.8%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.7%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households (66.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Apache and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 40.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.92%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Apache and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 22.3%), bachelor's degree (28.3% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 7.5%), and associate's degree (36.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.34%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Apache and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 16.8%), female disability (13.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 11.0%), and disability (13.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.71%), disability age 65 to 74 (29.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age over 75 (53.6% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 4.7%).