Brazilian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Brazilian
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Brazilians
Chickasaw
6,919
SOCIAL INDEX
66.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
136th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Brazilian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,160,710 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.103. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to an increase of 7.9 Chickasaw.
Brazilian vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,700 compared to $36,475, a difference of 28.0%), median household income ($88,934 compared to $70,005, a difference of 27.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,408 compared to $82,193, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.6%), householder income over 65 years ($61,465 compared to $53,732, a difference of 14.4%), and median female earnings ($40,483 compared to $34,414, a difference of 17.6%).
Income Metric | Brazilian | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,700 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,942 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $88,934 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,356 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,837 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,483 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,335 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $98,267 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $104,408 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,465 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 26.7% | Tragic 27.2% |
Brazilian vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 38.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 33.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.2%).
Poverty Metric | Brazilian | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Good 11.9% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Excellent 8.6% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Excellent 10.8% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Excellent 13.0% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.6% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 13.1% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.4% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.4% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.8% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.4% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.1% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.5% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.3% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Good 5.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.3% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.1% | Tragic 13.1% |
Brazilian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 26.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Brazilian | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 5.5% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.1% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Fair 4.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 5.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.1% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.4% |
Brazilian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Brazilian | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.6% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.5% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.8% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.3% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.7% | Tragic 79.0% |
Brazilian vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 23.5%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 19.5%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.14%), currently married (46.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and married-couple households (46.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.61%).
Family Structure Metric | Brazilian | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Poor 63.9% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.7% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.2% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.2% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.4% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Average 12.1% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.4% | Tragic 36.3% |
Brazilian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 38.3%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 32.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 27.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Brazilian | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.4% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.0% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.8% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.4% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Brazilian vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 48.4%), master's degree (16.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 44.9%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.8% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.41%).
Education Level Metric | Brazilian | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.1% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Fair 96.9% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Fair 96.0% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Average 94.9% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Good 93.8% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.3% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.9% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Good 60.5% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.7% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.8% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Brazilian vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 54.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 53.5%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 47.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 8.1%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 15.5%).
Disability Metric | Brazilian | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Excellent 10.9% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.4% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Good 2.9% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Good 17.1% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |