Immigrants from Belarus vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Belarus
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Belarus

Chickasaw

Good
Fair
7,566
SOCIAL INDEX
73.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
113th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Belarus Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,661,610 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Belarus communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.085. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belarus within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belarus corresponds to an increase of 15.8 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Belarus Integration in Chickasaw Communities

Immigrants from Belarus vs Chickasaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,303 compared to $36,475, a difference of 37.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,393 compared to $77,929, a difference of 37.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,430 compared to $82,193, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 5.6%), householder income over 65 years ($62,162 compared to $53,732, a difference of 15.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,743 compared to $44,763, a difference of 24.5%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Chickasaw Income
Income MetricImmigrants from BelarusChickasaw
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$50,303
Tragic
$36,475
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$114,586
Tragic
$85,356
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,399
Tragic
$70,005
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,043
Tragic
$40,672
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$62,658
Tragic
$47,832
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,757
Tragic
$34,414
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,743
Tragic
$44,763
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$107,393
Tragic
$77,929
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,430
Tragic
$82,193
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$62,162
Tragic
$53,732
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.7%
Tragic
27.2%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Chickasaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 48.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 42.2%), and single male poverty (11.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 10.1%), and receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 13.6%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Chickasaw Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from BelarusChickasaw
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Excellent
12.8%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.5%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.0%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
16.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.3%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.8%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Tragic
34.4%
Married Couples
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.8%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.5%
Tragic
13.1%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Chickasaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 36.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.5%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Chickasaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from BelarusChickasaw
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Fair
5.4%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Poor
4.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Chickasaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.0%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from BelarusChickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Good
65.2%
Tragic
62.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.4%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.0%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Tragic
79.0%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Chickasaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 48.1%), births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 41.5%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.47%), family households (63.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 2.7%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Chickasaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from BelarusChickasaw
Family Households
Tragic
63.7%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.2%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.17
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.1%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
25.6%
Tragic
36.3%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 113.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 56.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 10.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.9% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 23.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 43.0%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from BelarusChickasaw
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
83.3%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
47.9%
Exceptional
59.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
7.4%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Chickasaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 65.4%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 64.6%), and bachelor's degree (45.0% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.2% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.24%), 10th grade (94.4% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.32%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.44%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Chickasaw Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from BelarusChickasaw
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Average
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Average
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.0%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.3%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.2%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.2%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.3%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.2%
Tragic
60.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.1%
Tragic
53.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.8%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
45.0%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.9%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Chickasaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 70.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 65.9%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 59.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.1%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 12.3%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Chickasaw Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from BelarusChickasaw
Disability
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
15.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
15.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.0%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.7%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Tragic
51.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.9%