Crow vs Immigrants from Northern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,786,565 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Europe within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.240. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Northern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 2.1 Immigrants from Northern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $54,159, a difference of 70.7%), median family income ($76,605 compared to $121,840, a difference of 59.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $117,930, a difference of 58.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $54,571, a difference of 16.1%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $44,366, a difference of 25.8%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $53,872, a difference of 39.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 125.6%), family poverty (16.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 118.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 109.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 41.1%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 41.5%), and receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 46.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 252.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 229.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 224.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 23.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 10.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 73.7%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 40.9%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.3%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 24.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 15.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.21%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 0.59%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 96.7%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 83.2%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 74.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.050%), 10th grade (94.7% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.48%), and nursery school (99.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 44.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 32.9%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 6.9%).