Ethiopian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ethiopians
Chickasaw
7,266
SOCIAL INDEX
70.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
126th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Ethiopian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,457,185 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Ethiopian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.335. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ethiopians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ethiopians corresponds to an increase of 4.1 Chickasaw.
Ethiopian vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($89,640 compared to $70,005, a difference of 28.1%), per capita income ($46,569 compared to $36,475, a difference of 27.7%), and median family income ($108,251 compared to $85,356, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,243 compared to $47,832, a difference of 17.6%), householder income under 25 years ($53,818 compared to $44,763, a difference of 20.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,989 compared to $53,732, a difference of 20.9%).
Income Metric | Ethiopian | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,569 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,251 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,640 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $49,572 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,243 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,243 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,818 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,824 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,736 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,989 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.8% | Tragic 27.2% |
Ethiopian vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 46.2%), single father poverty (13.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 39.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.5%).
Poverty Metric | Ethiopian | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Average 12.2% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Average 11.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Good 13.3% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.4% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.5% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Average 16.3% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.5% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Average 16.5% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.9% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 13.5% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.7% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Good 5.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.8% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 13.1% |
Ethiopian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 32.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Ethiopian | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Fair 17.8% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.6% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Good 5.4% |
Ethiopian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (69.3% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (82.0% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 5.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ethiopian | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 69.3% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 82.0% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.2% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.2% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.9% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.8% | Tragic 79.0% |
Ethiopian vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 21.6%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 18.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 4.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Ethiopian | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 61.2% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.2% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.24 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.5% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.5% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Average 12.0% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.8% | Tragic 36.3% |
Ethiopian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 33.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 28.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 24.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ethiopian | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.5% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.1% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Ethiopian vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 59.3%), master's degree (18.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 57.3%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 55.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.17%), high school diploma (89.0% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.60%), and 12th grade, no diploma (91.0% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.72%).
Education Level Metric | Ethiopian | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.4% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Poor 92.2% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 91.0% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Fair 89.0% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.0% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.9% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.4% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.8% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.0% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Ethiopian vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 67.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 61.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.2%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 9.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 28.2%).
Disability Metric | Ethiopian | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.7% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.8% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.9% |