French vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,573,123 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within French communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.409. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.124% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French corresponds to an increase of 124.4 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,824 compared to $82,193, a difference of 21.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,665 compared to $77,929, a difference of 20.2%), and median family income ($102,368 compared to $85,356, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 5.6%), householder income over 65 years ($59,656 compared to $53,732, a difference of 11.0%), and median female earnings ($38,457 compared to $34,414, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 33.4%), family poverty (8.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 31.4%), and male poverty (10.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 4.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 39.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.94%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 17.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 16.1%), and divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.55%), average family size (3.10 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.9%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 7.3%), no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.46%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 26.4%), master's degree (14.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 25.7%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.21%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 35.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 27.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 6.7%), and disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 8.5%).