Subsaharan African vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Chickasaw
977
SOCIAL INDEX
7.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
330th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Subsaharan African Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,609,570 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Subsaharan African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.545. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sub-Saharan Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sub-Saharan Africans corresponds to an increase of 6.1 Chickasaw.
Subsaharan African vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 19.0%), median female earnings ($38,391 compared to $34,414, a difference of 11.6%), and median household income ($77,631 compared to $70,005, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,615 compared to $53,732, a difference of 5.4%), median male earnings ($50,408 compared to $47,832, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,235 compared to $77,929, a difference of 8.1%).
Income Metric | Subsaharan African | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,152 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $93,748 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $77,631 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $44,118 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,408 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,391 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $48,691 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,235 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $90,691 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,615 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.8% | Tragic 27.2% |
Subsaharan African vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 19.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 13.6%), and single female poverty (23.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), female poverty (15.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.69%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.91%).
Poverty Metric | Subsaharan African | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.9% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.0% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.0% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.1% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.2% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 16.9% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.4% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 13.1% |
Subsaharan African vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 25.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 6.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Subsaharan African | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 6.0% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 5.7% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.1% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.2% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.4% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.2% | Good 5.4% |
Subsaharan African vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.7% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Subsaharan African | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.2% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.4% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.7% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Poor 84.5% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 84.1% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.0% | Tragic 79.0% |
Subsaharan African vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.7%), divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and single mother households (7.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 0.99%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Subsaharan African | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.6% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.6% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.7% | Tragic 36.3% |
Subsaharan African vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 55.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 30.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 24.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Subsaharan African | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 87.9% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.9% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Subsaharan African vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 35.8%), master's degree (14.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 24.7%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.1% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.30%), ged/equivalency (84.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and high school diploma (87.9% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.55%).
Education Level Metric | Subsaharan African | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.4% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.1% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.9% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.2% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.3% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.9% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.8% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.2% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Poor 4.1% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
Subsaharan African vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 55.3%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 35.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.17%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.0%).
Disability Metric | Subsaharan African | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.1% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.2% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.9% |