Danish vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Danish
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Danes
Chickasaw
8,781
SOCIAL INDEX
85.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
48th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Danish Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,385,498 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Danish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.685. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Danes within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.090% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Danes corresponds to an increase of 90.0 Chickasaw.
Danish vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Danish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,619 compared to $82,193, a difference of 28.5%), median household income ($87,676 compared to $70,005, a difference of 25.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,221 compared to $77,929, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,730 compared to $34,414, a difference of 9.6%), wage/income gap (31.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 14.0%), and median earnings ($46,392 compared to $40,672, a difference of 14.1%).
Income Metric | Danish | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,095 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $105,900 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $87,676 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,392 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,246 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,730 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Excellent $53,041 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,221 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $105,619 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,117 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 31.0% | Tragic 27.2% |
Danish vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Danish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 48.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 46.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 13.8%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 20.1%), and single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 20.8%).
Poverty Metric | Danish | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.8% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.7% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Average 12.8% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Good 20.7% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.8% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Excellent 28.5% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.8% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.0% | Tragic 13.1% |
Danish vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Danish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 31.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 25.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.81%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 6.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Danish | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 4.5% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.4% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.3% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 3.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.7% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.1% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.5% | Good 5.4% |
Danish vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Danish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.7% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 16.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 4.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Danish | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Good 65.3% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 79.9% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 44.7% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 79.0% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.3% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.3% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Tragic 79.0% |
Danish vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Danish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 27.4%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 26.5%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.43%), family households with children (28.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (66.0% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Danish | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.0% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.7% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 51.1% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.17 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 50.5% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Tragic 36.3% |
Danish vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Danish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 15.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (63.3% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 11.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Danish | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.6% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 93.5% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 63.3% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 24.7% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Danish vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Danish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 29.8%), master's degree (14.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 27.3%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.24%).
Education Level Metric | Danish | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.2% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.5% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.8% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.4% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.5% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.7% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Good 47.4% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Average 38.1% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.4% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Tragic 1.5% |
Danish vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Danish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 53.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 41.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 10.5%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 10.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 17.9%).
Disability Metric | Danish | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Fair 5.7% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.4% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.8% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |