Arab vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Arab
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Arabs
Chickasaw
6,013
SOCIAL INDEX
57.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
166th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Arab Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,958,324 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Arab communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.236. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arabs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arabs corresponds to a decrease of 4.0 Chickasaw.
Arab vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Arab and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,566 compared to $82,193, a difference of 27.2%), median household income ($88,398 compared to $70,005, a difference of 26.3%), and median family income ($106,952 compared to $85,356, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 2.1%), householder income under 25 years ($51,219 compared to $44,763, a difference of 14.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,266 compared to $53,732, a difference of 15.9%).
Income Metric | Arab | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,662 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,952 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $88,398 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,599 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $57,298 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,718 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,219 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,336 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $104,566 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $62,266 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.6% | Tragic 27.2% |
Arab vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arab and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 28.4%), single female poverty (20.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 26.8%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.90%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.7%).
Poverty Metric | Arab | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Fair 12.7% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Fair 9.2% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Poor 11.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Fair 13.7% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Poor 20.5% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.2% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Average 17.4% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Fair 16.6% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Fair 16.8% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Fair 16.8% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Good 20.7% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Good 29.0% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Average 12.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.5% | Tragic 13.1% |
Arab vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arab and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 29.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.86%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Arab | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Fair 5.4% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Fair 5.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Poor 11.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Average 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.5% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.6% | Good 5.4% |
Arab vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arab and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Arab | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Good 65.2% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.2% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Good 36.8% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.6% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.3% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Poor 82.4% | Tragic 79.0% |
Arab vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arab and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 29.1%), births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 24.4%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.54%), currently married (47.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.79%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.89%).
Family Structure Metric | Arab | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Fair 64.1% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.9% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.2% | Tragic 36.3% |
Arab vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arab and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 33.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 23.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 17.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Arab | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.5% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 55.0% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.9% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Arab vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arab and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 50.1%), master's degree (16.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 46.2%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.0% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.020%), 9th grade (95.1% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.43%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.46%).
Education Level Metric | Arab | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Fair 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Average 97.0% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Good 96.2% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Good 95.9% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Good 95.1% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.0% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.6% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.2% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.6% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.0% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.9% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Arab vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arab and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 51.1%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 50.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 47.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 6.8%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.5%).
Disability Metric | Arab | Chickasaw |
Disability | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Excellent 10.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.8% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.1% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Average 3.0% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Good 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |