Immigrants from Romania vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Romania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Romania

Chickasaw

Exceptional
Fair
9,314
SOCIAL INDEX
90.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
21st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Romania Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,762,545 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Romania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.849. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Romania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.099% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Romania corresponds to an increase of 99.4 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Romania Integration in Chickasaw Communities

Immigrants from Romania vs Chickasaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,463 compared to $36,475, a difference of 35.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,633 compared to $82,193, a difference of 34.6%), and median household income ($94,222 compared to $70,005, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.51%), householder income over 65 years ($64,462 compared to $53,732, a difference of 20.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,522 compared to $44,763, a difference of 24.0%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Chickasaw Income
Income MetricImmigrants from RomaniaChickasaw
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,463
Tragic
$36,475
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$113,434
Tragic
$85,356
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,222
Tragic
$70,005
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,337
Tragic
$40,672
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,040
Tragic
$47,832
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,718
Tragic
$34,414
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,522
Tragic
$44,763
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,713
Tragic
$77,929
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$110,633
Tragic
$82,193
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,462
Tragic
$53,732
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
27.2%

Immigrants from Romania vs Chickasaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 44.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 40.6%), and single female poverty (18.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and single father poverty (15.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 22.1%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Chickasaw Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from RomaniaChickasaw
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Exceptional
12.0%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.0%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
16.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.8%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.2%
Tragic
34.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
11.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
13.1%

Immigrants from Romania vs Chickasaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 26.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.63%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Chickasaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from RomaniaChickasaw
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.5%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.5%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from Romania vs Chickasaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.9%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from RomaniaChickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Tragic
62.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.3%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.2%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Tragic
79.0%

Immigrants from Romania vs Chickasaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 33.4%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 30.2%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.23%), family households (64.6% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.2%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Chickasaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from RomaniaChickasaw
Family Households
Good
64.6%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.3%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
36.3%

Immigrants from Romania vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 45.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 23.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 17.8%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from RomaniaChickasaw
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Exceptional
59.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Exceptional
7.4%

Immigrants from Romania vs Chickasaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 59.9%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 54.7%), and bachelor's degree (42.9% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.26%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.27%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Chickasaw Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from RomaniaChickasaw
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.4%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.9%
Tragic
60.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
63.3%
Tragic
53.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.9%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.9%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Romania vs Chickasaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 61.2%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 58.5%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 11.3%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 12.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 18.9%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Chickasaw Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from RomaniaChickasaw
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
15.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
15.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.0%
Tragic
51.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Average
3.0%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
2.9%