Crow vs Burmese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Crow
Burmese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Crow
Burmese
2,555
SOCIAL INDEX
23.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
251st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Burmese Integration in Crow Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,880,567 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.028. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 8.1 Burmese.
Crow vs Burmese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $52,005, a difference of 63.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $121,444, a difference of 63.5%), and median household income ($63,681 compared to $103,145, a difference of 62.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $54,800, a difference of 16.6%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $44,911, a difference of 27.4%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $54,559, a difference of 40.9%).
Income Metric | Crow | Burmese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $31,729 | Exceptional $52,005 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $76,605 | Exceptional $123,369 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,681 | Exceptional $103,145 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,707 | Exceptional $54,559 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,434 | Exceptional $65,236 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,266 | Exceptional $44,911 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,012 | Exceptional $54,800 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $71,337 | Exceptional $113,701 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $74,257 | Exceptional $121,444 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $49,234 | Exceptional $71,139 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 28.0% |
Crow vs Burmese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 134.4%), married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 121.3%), and family poverty (16.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 120.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 36.5%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 47.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 51.0%).
Poverty Metric | Crow | Burmese |
Poverty | Tragic 20.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Families | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Males | Tragic 19.1% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Females | Tragic 22.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 33.2% | Exceptional 18.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 22.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 31.0% | Exceptional 13.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 26.0% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 13.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 26.4% | Exceptional 13.0% |
Single Males | Tragic 23.3% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 32.4% | Exceptional 18.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 30.3% | Exceptional 15.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 26.2% |
Married Couples | Tragic 9.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.9% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Crow vs Burmese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 263.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 236.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 233.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 16.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 29.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Crow | Burmese |
Unemployment | Tragic 11.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 20.1% | Excellent 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 26.2% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 18.7% | Excellent 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 15.4% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 10.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 17.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 16.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Crow vs Burmese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 11.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 8.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Crow | Burmese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 60.8% | Exceptional 66.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 73.3% | Exceptional 80.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.5% | Tragic 34.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.9% | Tragic 73.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 78.6% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 75.9% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 76.5% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.3% | Exceptional 83.6% |
Crow vs Burmese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 72.9%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 53.1%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.72%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and average family size (3.82 compared to 3.22, a difference of 18.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Crow | Burmese |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.3% | Exceptional 65.7% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.4% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.4% | Exceptional 49.8% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.82 | Fair 3.22 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 40.4% | Exceptional 48.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 40.4% | Exceptional 26.4% |
Crow vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 14.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 8.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Crow | Burmese |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 11.0% | Excellent 9.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Fair 89.3% | Excellent 90.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Good 55.7% | Exceptional 57.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.5% | Exceptional 20.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Crow vs Burmese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 94.5%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 85.3%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 78.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.7% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.25%), 9th grade (96.1% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and 11th grade (92.9% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.78%).
Education Level Metric | Crow | Burmese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Excellent 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 99.7% | Excellent 98.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 99.7% | Excellent 98.1% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 99.6% | Excellent 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 99.6% | Excellent 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 99.6% | Good 97.9% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 99.6% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 99.5% | Excellent 97.5% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 99.4% | Excellent 97.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 99.1% | Excellent 96.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 99.0% | Exceptional 96.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Exceptional 94.5% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Exceptional 93.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.0% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 90.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 88.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.2% | Exceptional 71.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.5% | Exceptional 66.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.6% | Exceptional 54.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 27.7% | Exceptional 46.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 19.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Crow vs Burmese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 58.7%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 48.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 4.0%), disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 8.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 10.3%).
Disability Metric | Crow | Burmese |
Disability | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Males | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.9% | Exceptional 20.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.6% | Exceptional 45.9% |
Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Fair 17.3% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Self-Care | Poor 2.5% | Exceptional 2.3% |