Immigrants from Congo vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Congo
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Congo
Chickasaw
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Congo Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,131,992 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.150. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 18.2 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Congo vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 25.3%), median male earnings ($44,204 compared to $47,832, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $77,929, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,317 compared to $34,414, a difference of 0.28%), per capita income ($35,720 compared to $36,475, a difference of 2.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($43,266 compared to $44,763, a difference of 3.5%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,720 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,216 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $66,768 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,169 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $44,204 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,317 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $43,266 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $72,178 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $77,850 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $51,393 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.7% | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 23.2%), single male poverty (13.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 17.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (22.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.6% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 0.40%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and single mother poverty (33.8% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 1.9%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 17.4% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.6% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.9% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 22.5% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 22.4% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.9% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.8% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.7% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.52%), male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.0% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.1% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.7% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Fair 84.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 79.0% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (39.0% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 17.6%), single mother households (8.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 15.2%), and currently married (41.1% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.3%), births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (27.3% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 59.2% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.3% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 39.0% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 41.1% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.8% | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 41.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 30.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 13.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 27.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.1% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.0% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.1% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 41.1%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.6%), and bachelor's degree (33.6% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.79%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.81%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.82%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.9% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.4% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.9% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.0% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.0% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.1% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.7% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.6% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.8% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.6% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 62.8%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 54.2%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 37.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 5.1%), cognitive disability (19.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 6.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.5%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 26.0% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Good 2.9% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.7% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.2% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |