Crow vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,381,486 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.174. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.021% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 21.1 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $51,770, a difference of 63.2%), median family income ($76,605 compared to $116,165, a difference of 51.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $111,914, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $54,352, a difference of 15.6%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $43,571, a difference of 23.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,234 compared to $66,376, a difference of 34.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (16.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 110.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 109.9%), and married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 108.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 36.0%), receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 39.2%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 41.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 248.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 230.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 226.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.92%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 10.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.3% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 72.8%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 42.2%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.9%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 34.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 21.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 84.3%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 74.4%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 59.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.7% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.050%), 9th grade (96.1% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.42%), and 11th grade (92.9% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 46.6%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 33.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.8%).