Peruvian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Peruvian
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Peruvians
Chickasaw
5,786
SOCIAL INDEX
55.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
168th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Peruvian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,881,676 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Peruvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.740. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Peruvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.065% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Peruvians corresponds to an increase of 64.8 Chickasaw.
Peruvian vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($90,261 compared to $70,005, a difference of 28.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,070 compared to $82,193, a difference of 27.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,886 compared to $77,929, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 6.1%), median male earnings ($55,659 compared to $47,832, a difference of 16.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,766 compared to $53,732, a difference of 16.8%).
Income Metric | Peruvian | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,479 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $105,444 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,261 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,628 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,659 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,234 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $56,052 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $98,886 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $105,070 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,766 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.6% | Tragic 27.2% |
Peruvian vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.2% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 42.1%), single male poverty (11.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 38.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.4%), and receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 11.4%).
Poverty Metric | Peruvian | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Excellent 11.8% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Excellent 12.9% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.2% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.3% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.5% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.7% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Average 11.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Peruvian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 23.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.2%), male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Peruvian | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 5.4% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Poor 11.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Fair 17.7% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Poor 10.5% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Fair 4.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Good 5.4% |
Peruvian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Peruvian | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.3% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.3% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.6% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.9% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.6% | Tragic 79.0% |
Peruvian vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 19.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.6%), and births to unmarried women (31.5% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.080%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and average family size (3.30 compared to 3.19, a difference of 3.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Peruvian | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.0% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.6% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.30 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.5% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Average 31.5% | Tragic 36.3% |
Peruvian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 43.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 15.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 13.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Peruvian | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.8% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 55.0% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.6% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Peruvian vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 41.0%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 34.1%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.2% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.19%), high school diploma (87.8% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.70%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.76%).
Education Level Metric | Peruvian | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.7% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.8% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.6% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.5% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.2% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.8% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.7% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.1% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Fair 58.6% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.4% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.3% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.3% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.5% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
Peruvian vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 63.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 63.4%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 9.3%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 10.9%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 19.3%).
Disability Metric | Peruvian | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.8% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |