U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

U.S. Virgin Islander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

U.S. Virgin Islanders

Chickasaw

Tragic
Fair
556
SOCIAL INDEX
3.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
343rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chickasaw Integration in U.S. Virgin Islander Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,230,170 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in U.S. Virgin Islanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.050% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 U.S. Virgin Islanders corresponds to an increase of 49.6 Chickasaw.
U.S. Virgin Islander Integration in Chickasaw Communities

U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chickasaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 26.1%), householder income under 25 years ($47,448 compared to $44,763, a difference of 6.0%), and median female earnings ($36,424 compared to $34,414, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($85,294 compared to $85,356, a difference of 0.070%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,736 compared to $82,193, a difference of 0.66%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,911 compared to $77,929, a difference of 1.3%).
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chickasaw Income
Income MetricU.S. Virgin IslanderChickasaw
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,589
Tragic
$36,475
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,294
Tragic
$85,356
Median Household Income
Tragic
$71,853
Tragic
$70,005
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,448
Tragic
$40,672
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,066
Tragic
$47,832
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,424
Tragic
$34,414
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,448
Tragic
$44,763
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,911
Tragic
$77,929
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,736
Tragic
$82,193
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,072
Tragic
$53,732
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
27.2%

U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chickasaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 32.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 31.4%), and receiving food stamps (16.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.6%), single father poverty (18.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 5.4%).
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chickasaw Poverty
Poverty MetricU.S. Virgin IslanderChickasaw
Poverty
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Tragic
17.3%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.0%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
22.1%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
16.3%
Single Females
Tragic
24.2%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.6%
Tragic
34.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
16.5%
Tragic
13.1%

U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chickasaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 27.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 26.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.5%).
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chickasaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricU.S. Virgin IslanderChickasaw
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
6.4%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Tragic
6.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
21.3%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.1%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.7%
Good
5.4%

U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chickasaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.6% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 14.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.6%).
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricU.S. Virgin IslanderChickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.7%
Tragic
62.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.4%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.6%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.0%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.2%
Tragic
79.0%

U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chickasaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 22.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 16.1%), and married-couple households (39.8% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.9%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.19, a difference of 3.3%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.0%).
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chickasaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricU.S. Virgin IslanderChickasaw
Family Households
Tragic
62.6%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Poor
27.1%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
39.8%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.6%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
40.7%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
39.6%
Tragic
36.3%

U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 95.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 60.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 9.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.5% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 24.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 44.2%).
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricU.S. Virgin IslanderChickasaw
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.6%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
47.5%
Exceptional
59.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.6%
Exceptional
7.4%

U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chickasaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 36.9%), master's degree (13.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 14.5%), and bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (60.6% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 0.20%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.70%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.74%).
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chickasaw Education Level
Education Level MetricU.S. Virgin IslanderChickasaw
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.7%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.3%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.1%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.6%
Tragic
60.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.8%
Tragic
53.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.1%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.2%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%

U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chickasaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 58.8%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 38.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 7.1%).
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chickasaw Disability
Disability MetricU.S. Virgin IslanderChickasaw
Disability
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
15.2%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
15.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.9%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.9%
Tragic
51.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.7%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.9%