Nonimmigrants vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Nonimmigrants
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Nonimmigrants
Chickasaw
3,083
SOCIAL INDEX
28.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
234th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Nonimmigrants Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,220,371 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Nonimmigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.426. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nonimmigrants within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nonimmigrants corresponds to an increase of 2.7 Chickasaw.
Nonimmigrants vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,448 compared to $82,193, a difference of 14.9%), median household income ($79,429 compared to $70,005, a difference of 13.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,301 compared to $77,929, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.090%), householder income over 65 years ($57,426 compared to $53,732, a difference of 6.9%), and median female earnings ($37,024 compared to $34,414, a difference of 7.6%).
Income Metric | Nonimmigrants | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,669 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $96,231 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $79,429 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $44,117 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $52,170 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,024 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,348 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $88,301 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $94,448 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $57,426 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 27.2% |
Nonimmigrants vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 13.8%), single male poverty (14.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 12.0%), and single female poverty (23.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.57%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.0%).
Poverty Metric | Nonimmigrants | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.5% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.7% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.3% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.6% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 32.2% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 10.9% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Average 12.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Poor 12.4% | Tragic 13.1% |
Nonimmigrants vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 33.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.94%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Nonimmigrants | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Poor 5.4% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Fair 17.9% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.5% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.1% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Poor 4.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Average 4.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Average 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.7% | Good 5.4% |
Nonimmigrants vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Nonimmigrants | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.5% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.1% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.1% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.2% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.2% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.2% | Tragic 79.0% |
Nonimmigrants vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.5%), divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 11.4%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.030%), family households (64.8% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.58%), and currently married (46.9% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.66%).
Family Structure Metric | Nonimmigrants | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.8% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.5% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.9% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Poor 6.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Good 46.9% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 35.5% | Tragic 36.3% |
Nonimmigrants vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.53%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.050%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.53%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Nonimmigrants | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.2% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.8% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.8% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Nonimmigrants vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (13.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 16.7%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 16.0%), and bachelor's degree (34.2% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.11%).
Education Level Metric | Nonimmigrants | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.2% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.3% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Good 92.7% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 91.0% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.2% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.9% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.5% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.9% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.2% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.9% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.5% |
Nonimmigrants vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 28.2%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 25.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 6.3%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.2%).
Disability Metric | Nonimmigrants | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.6% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.0% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.0% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Fair 17.4% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.9% |