Crow vs Latvian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Crow
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKiowaKoreanLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaSerbiaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Crow

Latvians

Fair
Exceptional
2,555
SOCIAL INDEX
23.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
251st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Latvian Integration in Crow Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,423,625 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.308. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 23.6 Latvians.
Crow Integration in Latvian Communities

Crow vs Latvian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $52,649, a difference of 65.9%), median family income ($76,605 compared to $120,301, a difference of 57.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $115,957, a difference of 56.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $52,783, a difference of 12.3%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $43,941, a difference of 24.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,234 compared to $67,326, a difference of 36.7%).
Crow vs Latvian Income
Income MetricCrowLatvian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$31,729
Exceptional
$52,649
Median Family Income
Tragic
$76,605
Exceptional
$120,301
Median Household Income
Tragic
$63,681
Exceptional
$97,311
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,707
Exceptional
$53,001
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,434
Exceptional
$63,498
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,266
Exceptional
$43,941
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,012
Excellent
$52,783
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$71,337
Exceptional
$108,926
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$74,257
Exceptional
$115,957
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,234
Exceptional
$67,326
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
27.9%

Crow vs Latvian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 145.2%), family poverty (16.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 127.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 113.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 43.7%), receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 47.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 47.3%).
Crow vs Latvian Poverty
Poverty MetricCrowLatvian
Poverty
Tragic
20.7%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
7.1%
Males
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
33.2%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
11.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
14.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
26.0%
Exceptional
13.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
13.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
26.4%
Exceptional
13.5%
Single Males
Tragic
23.3%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Tragic
32.4%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
30.3%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
26.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
9.1%

Crow vs Latvian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 275.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 242.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 237.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 26.8%).
Crow vs Latvian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCrowLatvian
Unemployment
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
20.1%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
26.2%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
10.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
5.9%
Excellent
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
4.9%

Crow vs Latvian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 11.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.3% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 7.0%).
Crow vs Latvian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCrowLatvian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.8%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.3%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.5%
Exceptional
38.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.9%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
78.6%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
75.9%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
76.5%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.3%
Exceptional
83.8%

Crow vs Latvian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 75.2%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 45.6%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 3.5%), family households (65.3% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 15.8%).
Crow vs Latvian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCrowLatvian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.3%
Tragic
62.8%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.4%
Exceptional
47.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.82
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
40.4%
Exceptional
48.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
40.4%
Exceptional
27.7%

Crow vs Latvian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 27.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 16.5%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 0.91%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 12.8%).
Crow vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCrowLatvian
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.0%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.3%
Excellent
90.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.7%
Excellent
56.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.5%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Fair
6.1%

Crow vs Latvian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 97.7%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 86.4%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 74.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.30%), 10th grade (94.7% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.92%), and nursery school (99.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Crow vs Latvian Education Level
Education Level MetricCrowLatvian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
99.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
99.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
99.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
99.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
99.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
99.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
99.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
99.4%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
99.1%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
99.0%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Exceptional
94.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
89.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Exceptional
71.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.5%
Exceptional
66.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.6%
Exceptional
53.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
27.7%
Exceptional
46.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
19.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.6%

Crow vs Latvian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 43.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.9% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 31.6%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.030%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 5.9%).
Crow vs Latvian Disability
Disability MetricCrowLatvian
Disability
Tragic
12.9%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.2%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.3%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.9%
Exceptional
21.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.6%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Fair
17.3%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%