Immigrants from Syria vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Syria
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Syria

Chickasaw

Average
Fair
5,570
SOCIAL INDEX
53.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
173rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Syria Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,511,930 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Syria communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Syria within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Syria corresponds to an increase of 5.2 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Syria Integration in Chickasaw Communities

Immigrants from Syria vs Chickasaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,858 compared to $82,193, a difference of 27.6%), median household income ($88,792 compared to $70,005, a difference of 26.8%), and median family income ($106,118 compared to $85,356, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.0%), householder income under 25 years ($51,494 compared to $44,763, a difference of 15.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,303 compared to $53,732, a difference of 16.0%).
Immigrants from Syria vs Chickasaw Income
Income MetricImmigrants from SyriaChickasaw
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,218
Tragic
$36,475
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,118
Tragic
$85,356
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$88,792
Tragic
$70,005
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,375
Tragic
$40,672
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,830
Tragic
$47,832
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,499
Tragic
$34,414
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,494
Tragic
$44,763
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,789
Tragic
$77,929
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$104,858
Tragic
$82,193
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,303
Tragic
$53,732
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.4%
Tragic
27.2%

Immigrants from Syria vs Chickasaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 33.2%), single female poverty (19.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 31.9%), and single male poverty (12.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.7%).
Immigrants from Syria vs Chickasaw Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from SyriaChickasaw
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Average
9.0%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Average
11.3%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Average
13.5%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.2%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.8%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Average
16.4%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.5%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
16.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.9%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Fathers
Excellent
15.9%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.3%
Tragic
34.4%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
10.9%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.7%
Tragic
13.1%

Immigrants from Syria vs Chickasaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.3%).
Immigrants from Syria vs Chickasaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from SyriaChickasaw
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.8%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.8%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from Syria vs Chickasaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.1%).
Immigrants from Syria vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from SyriaChickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Good
65.3%
Tragic
62.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.2%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.0%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.3%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Tragic
79.0%

Immigrants from Syria vs Chickasaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 24.2%), births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 23.6%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.42%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.52%), and family households (65.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Syria vs Chickasaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from SyriaChickasaw
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.4%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.1%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.26
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Excellent
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.2%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Average
46.8%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Tragic
36.3%

Immigrants from Syria vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 22.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 14.7%).
Immigrants from Syria vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from SyriaChickasaw
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.6%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.2%
Exceptional
59.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.4%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.3%
Exceptional
7.4%

Immigrants from Syria vs Chickasaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 46.3%), master's degree (16.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 41.6%), and no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.010%), high school diploma (89.0% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.64%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.65%).
Immigrants from Syria vs Chickasaw Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from SyriaChickasaw
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Fair
89.0%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.1%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.9%
Tragic
60.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.3%
Tragic
53.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.5%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.2%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Syria vs Chickasaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 56.1%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 54.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 53.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.8% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 7.2%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.9%).
Immigrants from Syria vs Chickasaw Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from SyriaChickasaw
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
15.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
15.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.7%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.8%
Tragic
51.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Good
17.2%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.9%