Immigrants from Grenada vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Grenada
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Grenada
Chickasaw
1,656
SOCIAL INDEX
14.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
293rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Grenada Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,867,596 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.584. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.150% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to an increase of 150.3 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Grenada vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 68.0%), median female earnings ($41,932 compared to $34,414, a difference of 21.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,538 compared to $44,763, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $82,193, a difference of 4.1%), median family income ($89,249 compared to $85,356, a difference of 4.6%), and median male earnings ($50,279 compared to $47,832, a difference of 5.1%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Grenada | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $41,123 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $89,249 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $76,517 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,596 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,279 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,932 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,538 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $88,311 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $85,552 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,747 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 16.2% | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants from Grenada vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 53.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 48.0%), and receiving food stamps (17.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (20.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 5.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (20.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 5.5%), and female poverty (16.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 6.0%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Grenada | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.2% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.3% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 16.9% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.3% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 7.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 15.8% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants from Grenada vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 54.4%), male unemployment (7.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 46.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Grenada | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 7.6% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 15.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 25.7% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.4% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.6% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.3% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from Grenada vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 51.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 10.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.3% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 1.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Grenada | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.6% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.7% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 25.4% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 67.2% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.8% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.3% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.0% | Tragic 79.0% |
Immigrants from Grenada vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 37.3%), married-couple households (37.5% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 22.4%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 0.030%), family households (62.6% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.19, a difference of 4.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Grenada | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 62.6% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.2% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 37.5% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 39.1% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 11.9% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants from Grenada vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 376.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 171.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 144.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 47.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 105.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 144.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Grenada | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 37.5% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 62.7% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 28.7% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants from Grenada vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 62.6%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 22.2%), and bachelor's degree (35.0% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.2%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Grenada | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.9% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.0% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.6% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.1% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.4% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.6% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.3% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.1% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.4% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.6% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.0% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.0% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Grenada vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 104.2%), disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 84.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 68.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.6%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 6.8%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Grenada | Chickasaw |
Disability | Excellent 11.5% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Fair 12.4% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.94% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Good 11.1% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.8% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 47.9% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.9% |