Immigrants from Yemen vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,364,127 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Yemen communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.160. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Yemen within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Yemen corresponds to a decrease of 13.1 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Yemen and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 29.0%), householder income over 65 years ($47,527 compared to $53,732, a difference of 13.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,575 compared to $82,193, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,693 compared to $34,414, a difference of 0.81%), householder income under 25 years ($43,591 compared to $44,763, a difference of 2.7%), and median earnings ($39,540 compared to $40,672, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Yemen and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (12.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 121.1%), receiving food stamps (21.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 65.3%), and family poverty (17.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 61.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (16.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 3.3%), single father poverty (20.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and single female poverty (28.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Yemen and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (16.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 124.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (8.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 86.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (8.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 75.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 18.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 20.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Yemen and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 21.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (74.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (59.6% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (78.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (78.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Yemen and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 26.2%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 25.7%), and births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.0% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.3%), family households with children (29.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Yemen and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 147.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 66.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 55.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (80.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 14.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.8% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 37.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 55.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Yemen and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (4.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 143.5%), college, under 1 year (55.3% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 9.4%), and high school diploma (81.8% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.2%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and bachelor's degree (29.9% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Yemen and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.91% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 91.7%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 59.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (52.0% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 1.5%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 4.7%).