Sioux vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Sioux
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Sioux
Chickasaw
2,469
SOCIAL INDEX
22.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
256th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Sioux Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,318,403 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Sioux communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.347. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sioux within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.107% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sioux corresponds to a decrease of 107.0 Chickasaw.
Sioux vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Sioux and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 11.7%), per capita income ($33,921 compared to $36,475, a difference of 7.5%), and median male earnings ($45,566 compared to $47,832, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($81,750 compared to $82,193, a difference of 0.54%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,089 compared to $77,929, a difference of 1.1%), and median female earnings ($35,063 compared to $34,414, a difference of 1.9%).
Income Metric | Sioux | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $33,921 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,386 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $67,792 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,448 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $45,566 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,063 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $46,417 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,089 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $81,750 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $52,509 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.3% | Tragic 27.2% |
Sioux vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sioux and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 50.2%), family poverty (15.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 46.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.8% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 12.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.6% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 16.7%), and single female poverty (31.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 19.0%).
Poverty Metric | Sioux | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 18.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 20.9% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.6% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 23.0% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 26.9% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 25.2% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 25.6% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 22.2% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 31.3% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 23.9% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.8% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 15.3% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 13.1% |
Sioux vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sioux and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 73.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 70.3%), and male unemployment (8.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 62.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 7.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Sioux | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 8.4% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 7.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.7% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.7% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 8.4% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Fair 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.7% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 11.5% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.9% | Good 5.4% |
Sioux vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sioux and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (79.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.8% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.2% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 0.83%).
Labor Participation Metric | Sioux | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.8% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.0% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.5% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.6% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 79.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 80.4% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.2% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.0% | Tragic 79.0% |
Sioux vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sioux and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.9%), single mother households (8.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.4%), and births to unmarried women (41.0% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.24%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.56%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 7.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Sioux | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Good 64.6% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.5% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.52 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 41.9% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 41.0% | Tragic 36.3% |
Sioux vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sioux and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 28.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 7.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.8% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.8% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 3.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Sioux | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.1% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.2% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.8% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.6% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.0% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Sioux vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sioux and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.0%), bachelor's degree (29.1% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.24%).
Education Level Metric | Sioux | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.6% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.9% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.4% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.0% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.5% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 29.1% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.7% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Sioux vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sioux and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 28.9%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 23.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.7% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 7.0%).
Disability Metric | Sioux | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.8% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.3% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.7% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Tragic 2.9% |