Haitian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Haitian
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Haitians
Chickasaw
1,345
SOCIAL INDEX
11.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
314th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Haitian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,827,170 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Haitian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Haitians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Haitians corresponds to an increase of 1.6 Chickasaw.
Haitian vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Haitian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 37.6%), householder income under 25 years ($50,231 compared to $44,763, a difference of 12.2%), and median female earnings ($36,374 compared to $34,414, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($85,218 compared to $85,356, a difference of 0.16%), median earnings ($40,918 compared to $40,672, a difference of 0.60%), and per capita income ($37,289 compared to $36,475, a difference of 2.2%).
Income Metric | Haitian | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,289 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,218 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $73,306 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,918 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $45,903 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,374 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,231 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,055 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $84,384 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $51,912 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 19.7% | Tragic 27.2% |
Haitian vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Haitian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 39.6%), receiving food stamps (17.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 35.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (15.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), male poverty (13.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and poverty (14.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 1.5%).
Poverty Metric | Haitian | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 14.9% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 11.5% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.0% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.2% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Poor 21.6% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.3% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.8% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.5% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 13.1% |
Haitian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Haitian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 24.4%), and unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Haitian | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 6.4% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.5% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.0% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Poor 4.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.5% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.6% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.4% | Good 5.4% |
Haitian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Haitian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 14.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Haitian | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Fair 65.0% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 33.4% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.6% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.1% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 82.8% | Tragic 79.0% |
Haitian vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Haitian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 18.2%), currently married (41.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 13.0%), and married-couple households (41.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.19, a difference of 5.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Haitian | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Poor 27.2% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.2% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.37 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 41.3% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 36.3% |
Haitian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Haitian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 89.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 61.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.6% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 24.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 43.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Haitian | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.9% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.1% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 47.6% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.5% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.6% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Haitian vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Haitian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 68.4%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 15.5%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
Education Level Metric | Haitian | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.8% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.7% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.3% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.5% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.9% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.1% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 57.8% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 52.3% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.0% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.3% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Haitian vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Haitian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 70.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 48.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 5.7%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.6%).
Disability Metric | Haitian | Chickasaw |
Disability | Average 11.7% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Average 12.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Average 11.2% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 23.4% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.4% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Poor 17.5% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.9% |