Crow vs Immigrants from Indonesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,576,022 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Indonesia within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.821. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.019% in Immigrants from Indonesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 18.7 Immigrants from Indonesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $113,519, a difference of 52.9%), median household income ($63,681 compared to $97,297, a difference of 52.8%), and per capita income ($31,729 compared to $48,195, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $55,521, a difference of 18.1%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $43,412, a difference of 23.1%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $51,715, a difference of 33.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 116.3%), single father poverty (30.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 106.1%), and single male poverty (23.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 100.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 27.9%), receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 36.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 41.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 235.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 231.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 227.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 23.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 11.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 61.0%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 45.7%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and average family size (3.82 compared to 3.27, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 9.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.75%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 69.4%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 65.5%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 60.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.9% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.58%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.80%), and 10th grade (94.7% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 51.3%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 49.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.6%).