Crow vs Dutch Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,018,034 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Dutch within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.407. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in Dutch. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 17.6 Dutch.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 55.5%), per capita income ($31,729 compared to $42,605, a difference of 34.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $99,650, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $37,339, a difference of 5.9%), householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $51,265, a difference of 9.0%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $45,370, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 127.7%), family poverty (16.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 106.1%), and male poverty (19.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 86.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 27.7%), receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 34.2%), and single female poverty (32.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 47.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 255.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 232.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (13.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 229.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 28.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 13.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 11.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 45.5%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 28.5%), and births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.070%), family households (65.3% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 61.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 61.6%, a difference of 10.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 29.8%), bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 28.8%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.42%), 10th grade (94.7% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.88%), and nursery school (99.7% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 35.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.9% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 19.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.82%), female disability (12.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and male disability (13.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.3%).