Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,437,530 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.347. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.071% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 71.2 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 18.9%), median household income ($78,682 compared to $70,005, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,736 compared to $77,929, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,298 compared to $47,832, a difference of 5.2%), householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $53,732, a difference of 6.3%), and median earnings ($43,998 compared to $40,672, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 24.3%), single female poverty (22.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 16.4%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (19.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 0.12%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.54%), and receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 22.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.090%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 17.0%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.6%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.070%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.74%), and family households (62.6% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 32.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 9.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 85.6%), master's degree (13.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 18.3%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.97%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 54.3%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 52.4%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 16.1%).