Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Scandinavian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Scandinavian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia

Scandinavians

Excellent
Good
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,944
SOCIAL INDEX
76.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
98th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Scandinavian Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,832,946 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.436. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.183% in Scandinavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 183.1 Scandinavians.
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Scandinavian Communities

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Scandinavian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $43,848, a difference of 18.1%), median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $38,306, a difference of 13.8%), and median earnings ($52,361 compared to $46,433, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $52,654, a difference of 3.2%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $61,586, a difference of 7.8%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Scandinavian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaScandinavian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$51,770
Average
$43,848
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$116,165
Good
$104,410
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,319
Good
$86,073
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,361
Average
$46,433
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$62,217
Good
$55,527
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,571
Tragic
$38,306
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,352
Good
$52,654
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$106,888
Good
$95,596
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,914
Good
$102,969
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,376
Good
$61,586
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
29.1%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Scandinavian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 12.3%), single female poverty (19.0% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 10.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (14.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.14%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and family poverty (7.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.68%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Scandinavian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaScandinavian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
11.1%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
12.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Fair
20.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
15.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Exceptional
14.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
14.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Average
21.1%
Single Fathers
Good
16.2%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
9.7%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Scandinavian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 15.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.3%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Scandinavian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaScandinavian
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.8%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.0%
Excellent
7.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Scandinavian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 19.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.48%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Scandinavian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaScandinavian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Average
36.6%
Exceptional
43.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.0%
Exceptional
78.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Good
83.0%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Scandinavian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.0%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.1%), and family households with children (26.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.10%), currently married (48.4% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (63.4% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.5%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Scandinavian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaScandinavian
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.2%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Exceptional
49.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.4%
Exceptional
29.8%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Scandinavian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 68.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 38.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 5.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 27.8%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Scandinavian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaScandinavian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
7.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
93.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
54.1%
Exceptional
62.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
23.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
8.0%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Scandinavian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 37.4%), master's degree (18.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 29.2%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.9% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.36%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.36%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Scandinavian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaScandinavian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
97.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
96.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
91.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.6%
Exceptional
67.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.1%
Excellent
61.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.9%
Good
46.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.0%
Average
37.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.5%
Fair
14.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.8%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.4%
Average
1.8%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Scandinavian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.5%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Scandinavian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaScandinavian
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.0%
Average
23.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Exceptional
46.6%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.2%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.4%