Immigrants from Jamaica vs Hispanic or Latino Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 301,767,555 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Hispanics or Latinos within Immigrant from Jamaica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.499. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jamaica within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.779% in Hispanics or Latinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jamaica corresponds to a decrease of 779.3 Hispanics or Latinos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.8% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 32.0%), median female earnings ($38,625 compared to $34,421, a difference of 12.2%), and per capita income ($38,766 compared to $35,688, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,035 compared to $86,006, a difference of 1.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,038 compared to $50,279, a difference of 1.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,027 compared to $52,832, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 20.4%), single female poverty (21.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 15.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.3% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 20.7%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 19.7%), and male unemployment (6.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.2% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.61%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.5%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 11.7%), and married-couple households (40.7% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.33 compared to 3.41, a difference of 2.2%), births to unmarried women (38.8% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and family households (64.7% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 72.6%), no vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 56.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 52.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.8% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.5% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 30.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 52.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 23.7%), master's degree (13.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 19.3%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.53%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 19.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 12.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.27%), female disability (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.3%).