Luxembourger vs Finnish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Finnish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Finns

Excellent
Good
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,815
SOCIAL INDEX
65.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
141st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Finnish Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,229,481 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Finns within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.607. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.172% in Finns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 172.3 Finns.
Luxembourger Integration in Finnish Communities

Luxembourger vs Finnish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,663 compared to $43,461, a difference of 5.1%), median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $38,173, a difference of 4.5%), and wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $59,535, a difference of 2.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,237 compared to $94,610, a difference of 2.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $51,827, a difference of 2.9%).
Luxembourger vs Finnish Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerFinnish
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Average
$43,461
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Average
$102,676
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Fair
$83,607
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Fair
$45,940
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Average
$54,721
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Tragic
$38,173
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Fair
$51,827
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Average
$94,610
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Average
$99,904
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Poor
$59,535
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
28.6%

Luxembourger vs Finnish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 13.8%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 11.2%), and male poverty (9.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.35%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.44%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.93%).
Luxembourger vs Finnish Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerFinnish
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
12.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Fair
13.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Excellent
16.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Exceptional
14.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
13.6%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Poor
21.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Tragic
16.9%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Tragic
30.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
10.2%

Luxembourger vs Finnish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 29.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.66%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.1%).
Luxembourger vs Finnish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerFinnish
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
15.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
8.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%

Luxembourger vs Finnish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.9% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.3%).
Luxembourger vs Finnish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerFinnish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
64.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Fair
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Exceptional
43.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Exceptional
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Excellent
83.1%

Luxembourger vs Finnish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 9.9%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.10 compared to 3.09, a difference of 0.27%), family households (63.3% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.33%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.70%).
Luxembourger vs Finnish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerFinnish
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Exceptional
48.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Tragic
3.09
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Average
31.7%

Luxembourger vs Finnish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 43.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 2.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 6.7%).
Luxembourger vs Finnish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerFinnish
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Exceptional
60.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Exceptional
22.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
7.3%

Luxembourger vs Finnish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 10.6%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 8.8%), and bachelor's degree (39.8% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (91.7% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.020%), 12th grade, no diploma (93.3% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.12%).
Luxembourger vs Finnish Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerFinnish
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
94.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Exceptional
93.4%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Exceptional
88.2%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Excellent
66.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Good
60.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Average
46.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Fair
36.7%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Poor
14.2%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Poor
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Average
1.8%

Luxembourger vs Finnish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 20.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 14.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.4%), disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 7.2%).
Luxembourger vs Finnish Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerFinnish
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.7%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
12.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Good
22.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Poor
6.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Good
2.4%