Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,404,799 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.351. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 8.2 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 23.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,385 compared to $101,387, a difference of 10.9%), and median male earnings ($50,298 compared to $55,382, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $38,738, a difference of 1.9%), householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $51,224, a difference of 5.1%), and median earnings ($43,998 compared to $46,658, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 38.5%), family poverty (10.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 31.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 2.0%), single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 22.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 21.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 19.8%), married-couple households (43.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 11.8%), and currently married (44.3% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.0%), births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and family households (62.6% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 33.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 15.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 10.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 93.9%), master's degree (13.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 7.4%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 34.1%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 20.9%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.030%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.6%).