Immigrants from Oceania vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Czechoslovakian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Czechoslovakians
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Czechoslovakian Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 238,988,548 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.513. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.075% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 75.4 Czechoslovakians.
Immigrants from Oceania vs Czechoslovakian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 10.0%), householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $60,581, a difference of 6.3%), and median household income ($89,100 compared to $84,965, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $55,382, a difference of 0.60%), median earnings ($47,617 compared to $46,658, a difference of 2.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,705 compared to $101,387, a difference of 2.3%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Czechoslovakian |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,220 | Average $43,806 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,453 | Average $103,273 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,100 | Average $84,965 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,617 | Average $46,658 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,712 | Good $55,382 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,297 | Poor $38,738 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,680 | Tragic $51,224 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,623 | Average $95,070 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,705 | Good $101,387 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,416 | Average $60,581 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.6% | Tragic 28.2% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.4%), receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 10.6%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.62%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 1.2%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Czechoslovakian |
Poverty | Average 12.3% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Families | Good 8.7% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Average 13.3% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.7% | Good 20.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.5% | Fair 13.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.9% | Good 16.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 16.0% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.1% | Excellent 15.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.4% | Tragic 13.4% |
Single Females | Good 20.7% | Fair 21.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 17.1% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.7% | Poor 29.7% |
Married Couples | Good 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.4% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.4% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 12.5%), unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.9%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.50%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Czechoslovakian |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Average 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 9.0% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Fair 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.1% | Fair 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 10.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.84%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.89%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Czechoslovakian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Tragic 64.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Average 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.9% | Exceptional 41.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Exceptional 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.0% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.9% | Excellent 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.1% | Good 83.0% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.7%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.13, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.42%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 3.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Czechoslovakian |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Excellent 64.6% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.9% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.29 | Tragic 3.13 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Average 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.3% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Currently Married | Average 46.5% | Exceptional 48.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 11.9% | Poor 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.6% | Fair 32.0% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 24.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.35%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 3.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Czechoslovakian |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.7% | Exceptional 7.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.4% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.5% | Exceptional 59.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.8% | Exceptional 21.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Czechoslovakian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 38.4%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (59.4% compared to 59.4%, a difference of 0.15%), college, under 1 year (65.6% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.35%), and associate's degree (45.8% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.43%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Czechoslovakian |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Poor 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.5% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Exceptional 95.1% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.2% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 90.9% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Fair 88.8% | Exceptional 90.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.5% | Exceptional 87.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.6% | Good 65.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Average 59.4% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Average 46.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.3% | Fair 37.0% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.7% | Fair 14.5% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.6% | Fair 4.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Fair 1.8% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Czechoslovakian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 30.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.6%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.3%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.1%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Czechoslovakian |
Disability | Fair 11.8% | Tragic 12.5% |
Males | Fair 11.4% | Tragic 12.3% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.4% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 24.0% | Good 23.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.0% | Exceptional 46.6% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Average 2.5% |