Immigrants from France vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 228,926,622 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from France communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.875. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from France within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.362% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from France corresponds to an increase of 362.0 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,557 compared to $43,806, a difference of 24.5%), median family income ($120,076 compared to $103,273, a difference of 16.3%), and median male earnings ($63,715 compared to $55,382, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.9%), householder income under 25 years ($53,805 compared to $51,224, a difference of 5.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,826 compared to $60,581, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 16.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 15.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.1%), receiving food stamps (10.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 18.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.98%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 19.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.6%), births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 10.5%), and married-couple households (45.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.58%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 65.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 26.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 5.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 14.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 23.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 61.7%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 59.8%), and master's degree (20.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.26%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.26%), and 12th grade, no diploma (92.4% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 27.8%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 21.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.9%).