Immigrants from Romania vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Romania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Romania

Czechoslovakians

Exceptional
Good
9,314
SOCIAL INDEX
90.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
21st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Czechoslovakian Integration in Immigrants from Romania Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,535,497 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Romania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.750. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Romania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.556% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Romania corresponds to an increase of 556.5 Czechoslovakians.
Immigrants from Romania Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

Immigrants from Romania vs Czechoslovakian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,463 compared to $43,806, a difference of 12.9%), median household income ($94,222 compared to $84,965, a difference of 10.9%), and median female earnings ($42,718 compared to $38,738, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.3%), householder income over 65 years ($64,462 compared to $60,581, a difference of 6.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,522 compared to $51,224, a difference of 8.4%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Czechoslovakian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from RomaniaCzechoslovakian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,463
Average
$43,806
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$113,434
Average
$103,273
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,222
Average
$84,965
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,337
Average
$46,658
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,040
Good
$55,382
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,718
Poor
$38,738
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,522
Tragic
$51,224
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,713
Average
$95,070
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$110,633
Good
$101,387
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,462
Average
$60,581
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
28.2%

Immigrants from Romania vs Czechoslovakian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 14.0%), single female poverty (18.8% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 13.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.2%), receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and poverty (11.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.8%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from RomaniaCzechoslovakian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Exceptional
12.0%
Exceptional
12.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.0%
Good
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Fair
13.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Good
16.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
15.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
15.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Excellent
15.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.8%
Fair
21.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.2%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
11.9%
Exceptional
10.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.3%

Immigrants from Romania vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.87%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from RomaniaCzechoslovakian
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.5%
Exceptional
16.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Average
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Excellent
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.1%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%

Immigrants from Romania vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.36%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from RomaniaCzechoslovakian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Tragic
64.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Average
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.3%
Exceptional
41.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.2%
Exceptional
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Good
83.0%

Immigrants from Romania vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 14.9%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.6%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.10%), married-couple households (48.3% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.53%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 0.81%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from RomaniaCzechoslovakian
Family Households
Good
64.6%
Excellent
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.3%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.5%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.9%
Fair
32.0%

Immigrants from Romania vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 45.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 17.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 15.3%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from RomaniaCzechoslovakian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Exceptional
59.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Exceptional
7.1%

Immigrants from Romania vs Czechoslovakian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 27.8%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 21.7%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.5% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 0.12%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.34%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Czechoslovakian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from RomaniaCzechoslovakian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
95.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.4%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Exceptional
87.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.9%
Good
65.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
63.3%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.9%
Average
46.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.9%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Fair
14.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Fair
1.8%

Immigrants from Romania vs Czechoslovakian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 27.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.8%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.4%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Czechoslovakian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from RomaniaCzechoslovakian
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.5%
Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Good
23.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.0%
Exceptional
46.6%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Average
3.0%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Average
2.5%