Immigrants from Jamaica vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,593,005 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Jamaica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.532. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jamaica within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jamaica corresponds to a decrease of 6.3 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.8% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 49.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,035 compared to $101,387, a difference of 16.5%), and median family income ($89,268 compared to $103,273, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,625 compared to $38,738, a difference of 0.29%), householder income under 25 years ($51,038 compared to $51,224, a difference of 0.36%), and median earnings ($43,026 compared to $46,658, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 64.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 47.4%), and married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.3% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 0.21%), single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 0.45%), and single father poverty (17.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 35.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 34.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.2% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 30.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 42.0%), births to unmarried women (38.8% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 21.1%), and married-couple households (40.7% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.080%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.73%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 81.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 61.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 7.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.5% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 34.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 48.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 51.4%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.1%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.96%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.97%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 35.7%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 22.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.56%), female disability (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.81%), and disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.2%).