Immigrants from Jordan vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 154,015,012 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.104. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to an increase of 9.2 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 7.2%), median female earnings ($40,977 compared to $38,738, a difference of 5.8%), and median household income ($89,412 compared to $84,965, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $51,224, a difference of 0.29%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,185 compared to $95,070, a difference of 2.2%), and per capita income ($45,066 compared to $43,806, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 10.7%), and single female poverty (19.3% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (15.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.53%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and female poverty (12.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.5%), unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.30%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 10.6%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.60%), married-couple households (47.7% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 10.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 9.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 25.1%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 13.6%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.48%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.48%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 33.5%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 23.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.83%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 2.6%).