Arapaho vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Arapaho
Czechoslovakian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Arapaho
Czechoslovakians
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Czechoslovakian Integration in Arapaho Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,128,687 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.038. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 1.1 Czechoslovakians.
Arapaho vs Czechoslovakian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $43,806, a difference of 35.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $101,387, a difference of 33.5%), and median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $55,382, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $60,581, a difference of 2.0%), householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $51,224, a difference of 16.4%), and wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 20.2%).
Income Metric | Arapaho | Czechoslovakian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,345 | Average $43,806 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,064 | Average $103,273 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $67,965 | Average $84,965 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,586 | Average $46,658 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $41,758 | Good $55,382 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $31,489 | Poor $38,738 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,003 | Tragic $51,224 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $71,697 | Average $95,070 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $75,945 | Good $101,387 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,383 | Average $60,581 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.5% | Tragic 28.2% |
Arapaho vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 63.9%), family poverty (12.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 58.1%), and married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 12.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 16.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 23.1%).
Poverty Metric | Arapaho | Czechoslovakian |
Poverty | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Families | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Tragic 17.5% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.2% | Good 20.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.8% | Fair 13.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.1% | Good 16.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.8% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Excellent 15.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 13.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.4% | Fair 21.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 24.0% | Tragic 17.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.4% | Poor 29.7% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.6% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.7% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Arapaho vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 147.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 137.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 129.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 17.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Arapaho | Czechoslovakian |
Unemployment | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Tragic 11.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Tragic 8.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 25.2% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 15.4% | Average 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 12.8% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 10.3% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 19.0% | Fair 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 16.8% | Fair 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Arapaho vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 11.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 5.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Arapaho | Czechoslovakian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.1% | Tragic 64.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 74.4% | Average 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.3% | Exceptional 41.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.8% | Exceptional 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 76.6% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.5% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 78.1% | Excellent 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.1% | Good 83.0% |
Arapaho vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 47.0%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 25.0%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.9%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 16.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Arapaho | Czechoslovakian |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.5% | Excellent 64.6% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.6% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.8% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.64 | Tragic 3.13 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Average 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Currently Married | Tragic 40.5% | Exceptional 48.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.8% | Poor 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 47.1% | Fair 32.0% |
Arapaho vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 31.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 21.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.43%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 0.75%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 6.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Arapaho | Czechoslovakian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.7% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.2% | Exceptional 59.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 26.4% | Exceptional 21.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Arapaho vs Czechoslovakian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 53.5%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 46.3%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.0%), 5th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.0%), and 6th grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.030%).
Education Level Metric | Arapaho | Czechoslovakian |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Exceptional 95.1% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.4% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.6% | Exceptional 90.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.8% | Exceptional 87.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.3% | Good 65.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.1% | Average 59.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 36.7% | Average 46.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 26.6% | Fair 37.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.0% | Fair 14.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.9% | Fair 4.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.2% | Fair 1.8% |
Arapaho vs Czechoslovakian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 27.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.5%), female disability (13.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.6%).
Disability Metric | Arapaho | Czechoslovakian |
Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 12.5% |
Males | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 12.3% |
Females | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.1% | Good 23.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.8% | Exceptional 46.6% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Average 2.5% |