Finnish vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 307,733,942 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Finnish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.364. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Finns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Finns corresponds to an increase of 12.0 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Finnish and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,535 compared to $60,581, a difference of 1.8%), median household income ($83,607 compared to $84,965, a difference of 1.6%), and median earnings ($45,940 compared to $46,658, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,610 compared to $95,070, a difference of 0.49%), median family income ($102,676 compared to $103,273, a difference of 0.58%), and per capita income ($43,461 compared to $43,806, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Finnish and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 4.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.30%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and female poverty (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Finnish and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 5.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.62%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Finnish and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.9% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.7% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.22%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Finnish and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (63.5% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.8% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 0.12%), married-couple households (48.1% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.84%), and average family size (3.09 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 2.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.13%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 0.88%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Finnish and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 11.1%), master's degree (14.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and college, under 1 year (66.9% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.17%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 5.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 0.32%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.55%), and female disability (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.66%).