Immigrants from Norway vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Norway
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Norway

Czechoslovakians

Good
Good
7,420
SOCIAL INDEX
71.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
117th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Czechoslovakian Integration in Immigrants from Norway Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,916,040 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Norway communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.877. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Norway within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.269% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Norway corresponds to an increase of 269.0 Czechoslovakians.
Immigrants from Norway Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

Immigrants from Norway vs Czechoslovakian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,217 compared to $43,806, a difference of 19.2%), median family income ($115,847 compared to $103,273, a difference of 12.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,629 compared to $95,070, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,984 compared to $51,224, a difference of 0.47%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,118 compared to $60,581, a difference of 9.1%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Czechoslovakian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from NorwayCzechoslovakian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,217
Average
$43,806
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,847
Average
$103,273
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,846
Average
$84,965
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,758
Average
$46,658
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,628
Good
$55,382
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,837
Poor
$38,738
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,984
Tragic
$51,224
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$106,629
Average
$95,070
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,669
Good
$101,387
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,118
Average
$60,581
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
28.2%

Immigrants from Norway vs Czechoslovakian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 10.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 10.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (15.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.080%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.60%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.75%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from NorwayCzechoslovakian
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Excellent
12.8%
Exceptional
12.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.4%
Good
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Fair
13.7%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.3%
Good
16.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
15.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
15.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Excellent
15.5%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Good
20.8%
Fair
21.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Average
29.3%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.5%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Exceptional
10.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.3%

Immigrants from Norway vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 22.9%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.69%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from NorwayCzechoslovakian
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.5%
Exceptional
16.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.8%
Average
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Excellent
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%

Immigrants from Norway vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 16.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.58%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.53%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from NorwayCzechoslovakian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.6%
Tragic
64.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.2%
Average
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.9%
Exceptional
41.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Exceptional
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.5%
Good
83.0%

Immigrants from Norway vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.5%), births to unmarried women (29.9% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.47%), currently married (47.2% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.6%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from NorwayCzechoslovakian
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Excellent
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.5%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Good
47.2%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.9%
Fair
32.0%

Immigrants from Norway vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 46.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 14.6%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from NorwayCzechoslovakian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.4%
Exceptional
59.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
19.0%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Exceptional
7.1%

Immigrants from Norway vs Czechoslovakian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 42.8%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 34.0%), and master's degree (18.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.5% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 0.10%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.24%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Czechoslovakian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from NorwayCzechoslovakian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
95.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.5%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Exceptional
87.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.2%
Good
65.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.7%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.2%
Average
46.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.5%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.8%
Fair
14.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.0%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.4%
Fair
1.8%

Immigrants from Norway vs Czechoslovakian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 19.8%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 11.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.4%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.9%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Czechoslovakian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from NorwayCzechoslovakian
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
12.5%
Males
Average
11.3%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.8%
Good
23.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Exceptional
46.6%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Average
2.5%