Ute vs Immigrants from North America Female Poverty
COMPARE
Ute
Immigrants from North America
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Ute
Immigrants from North America
17.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
79th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Immigrants from North America Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,666,863 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477 and weighted average of 17.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,028,692 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.657 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 41.8%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Immigrants from North America |
| Minimum | 4.6% | 3.5% |
| Maximum | 73.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 68.4% | 96.5% |
| Mean | 23.1% | 26.2% |
| Median | 17.9% | 16.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.1% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.9% | 28.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 17.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.7% | 24.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.5% | 24.2% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Ute by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Cajun (17.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Dominica (17.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Arapaho (17.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from North America by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North America are Slovak (12.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sweden (12.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Jordanian (12.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Egyptian (12.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Serbian (12.3%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Cambodians | 97.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Europeans | 97.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |