Chickasaw vs Bangladeshi Male Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Bangladeshi
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Bangladeshis
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.6%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Bangladeshi Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,334,691 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.002 and weighted average of 13.6%, a difference of 1.0%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Bangladeshi |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 3.9% |
| Maximum | 33.0% | 28.8% |
| Range | 30.8% | 24.9% |
| Mean | 15.0% | 13.8% |
| Median | 14.0% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 10.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.0% | 17.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Bangladeshis by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Spanish American (13.4%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Belizean (13.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Haitian (13.7%, a difference of 0.27%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and Mexican (13.7%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 13.8% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 13.8% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 13.8% |