Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Oceania Male Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Oceania
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Oceania
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
MALE POVERTY
50.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
174th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Oceania Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,340,172 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.159 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 20.6%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 3.0% |
| Maximum | 33.0% | 23.0% |
| Range | 30.8% | 20.0% |
| Mean | 15.0% | 12.3% |
| Median | 14.0% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.0% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 4.8% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Pennsylvania German (11.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (11.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Uruguayan (11.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Celtic (11.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and South American (11.1%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Hungarians | 55.1 /100 | #167 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 54.2 /100 | #169 | Average 11.1% |
| South Americans | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 11.1% |
| Uruguayans | 51.0 /100 | #171 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 50.7 /100 | #172 | Average 11.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 50.5 /100 | #173 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 11.2% |
| Celtics | 47.5 /100 | #175 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 46.0 /100 | #176 | Average 11.2% |
| Lebanese | 45.6 /100 | #177 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 40.3 /100 | #179 | Average 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 40.1 /100 | #180 | Average 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 39.5 /100 | #181 | Fair 11.3% |