Chickasaw vs White/Caucasian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
White/Caucasian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Whites/Caucasians
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
MALE POVERTY
56.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs White/Caucasian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 582,582,417 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.885 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 21.4%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | White/Caucasian |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 8.1% |
| Maximum | 33.0% | 31.3% |
| Range | 30.8% | 23.2% |
| Mean | 15.0% | 14.2% |
| Median | 14.0% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.0% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 4.4% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Ethiopian (11.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Chile (11.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Spain (11.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Albania (11.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Hungarian (11.1%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
| Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
| Colombians | 63.0 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |
| Taiwanese | 62.7 /100 | #159 | Good 11.0% |
| Soviet Union | 60.3 /100 | #160 | Good 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 59.7 /100 | #161 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #162 | Average 11.1% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 56.7 /100 | #163 | Average 11.1% |
| Ethiopians | 56.7 /100 | #164 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 55.5 /100 | #165 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 55.3 /100 | #166 | Average 11.1% |
| Hungarians | 55.1 /100 | #167 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 54.2 /100 | #169 | Average 11.1% |
| South Americans | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 11.1% |