Chickasaw vs Mexican American Indian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Mexican American Indian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Mexican American Indians
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Mexican American Indian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,482,192 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 3.9%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Mexican American Indian |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 33.0% | 35.9% |
| Range | 30.8% | 33.3% |
| Mean | 15.0% | 15.1% |
| Median | 14.0% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 10.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.0% | 17.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Mexican American Indians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Spanish American (13.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Cree (13.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Guyanese (13.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and Subsaharan African (13.3%, a difference of 1.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Immigrants from Liberia (13.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (13.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Ghana (12.9%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (13.1%, a difference of 0.55%), and Cape Verdean (13.1%, a difference of 0.68%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |