Chickasaw vs South African Male Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
South African
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
South Africans
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
86.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs South African Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,517,352 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.864 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 26.4%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | South African |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 33.0% | 75.0% |
| Range | 30.8% | 73.0% |
| Mean | 15.0% | 9.9% |
| Median | 14.0% | 7.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.0% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 14.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 13.8% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are French (10.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Native Hawaiian (10.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Peruvian (10.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from China (10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Hungary (10.7%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Sri Lankans | 88.1 /100 | #116 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.1 /100 | #117 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Okinawans | 87.6 /100 | #118 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 87.6 /100 | #119 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | China | 87.1 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Peruvians | 87.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 87.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.7% |
| South Africans | 86.8 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.7% |
| French | 86.7 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 86.0 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 84.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 84.3 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 84.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 84.1 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |